TEHRANI V POLAR ELECTRO, No. 08-1135 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1135 FLEUR T. TEHRANI, PH.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POLAR ELECTRO and POLAR ELECTRO OY, Defendants-Appellees, and PHYSI-CAL ENTERPRISES, Defendant, and CAT EYE CO., LTD., Defendant-Appellee. William C. Rooklidge, Howrey LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for plaintiffappellant. With him on the brief was Henry A. Petri, Jr., of Houston, Texas. John P. Moran, Holland & Knight LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Polar Electro, et al. With him on the brief was Tamara F. Carmichael, of New York, New York. Joseph M. Kuo, Olson & Cepuritis, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Cat Eye Co., Ltd. With him on the brief were Seymour Rothstein and Matthew D. Kellam. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge David O. Carter NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1135 FLEUR T. TEHRANI, PH.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POLAR ELECTRO and POLAR ELECTRO OY, Defendants-Appellees, and PHYSI-CAL ENTERPRISES, Defendant, and CAT EYE CO., LTD., Defendant-Appellee. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-1113 and 06-CV-20 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED December 5, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
