SPIROFLOW SYSTEMS V FLEXICON CORP, No. 08-1034 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
CORRECTED NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1034 SPIROFLOW SYSTEMS, INC. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLEXICON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. W. Thad Adams, III, Adams Intellectual Property Law, P.A., of Charlotte, North Carolina, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Stephen S. Ashley, Jr. Randolph J. Huis, Volpe and Koenig, P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stephen B. Schott. Of counsel on the brief were Michael S. Connor, Lance A. Lawson, and Brian F. McMahon, Alston & Bird, LLP, of Charlotte, North Carolina. Of counsel was John J. O Malley, Volpe and Koenig, P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Magistrate David Keesler NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1034 SPIROFLOW SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLEXICON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina In CASE NO(S). 3:02-CV-70. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: June 10, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
