WAVESTREAM V CAP WIRELESS, No. 07-1264 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1264 WAVESTREAM CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAP WIRELESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Charles S. Barquist, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Anthony L. Press, and Brian F. McMahon. Robert E. Camors, Jr., Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner, LLP, of San Jose, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were David B. Ritchie, and Richard S. Swope. Of counsel was Nguyen Huu Nguyen. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge S. James Otero NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1264 WAVESTREAM CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAP WIRELESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In CASE NO(S). 05-CV-4254. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and LOURIE, Circuit Judge): AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: December 7, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.