AMINI INNOVATION V ANTHONY CALIF, No. 07-1182 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1182 AMINI INNOVATION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTHONY CALIFORNIA, INC. and JAMES CHANG, Defendants-Appellees. Mark D. Nielsen, Cislo & Thomas LLP, of Santa Monica, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Daniel M. Cislo and Kelly W. Cunningham. Edward F. O Connor, O Connor Christensen & McLaughlin, Trial Division of The Eclipse Group LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendants-appellees. On the brief were Thomas T. Chan, Ronald M. St. Marie, and Lisa A. Karczewski, Chan Law Group LLP, of Los Angeles, California. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge S. James Otero NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1182 AMINI INNOVATION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTHONY CALIFORNIA, INC. and JAMES CHANG, Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Central District of California In CASE NO(S). 03-CV-8749. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and MOORE, Circuit Judge). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: November 13, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.