Air Trans Assn Amer v. DOT, et al, No. 96-1253 (D.C. Cir. 1997)
Annotate this Case
United States Court of Appeals
for the district of columbia circuit
No. 96-1253 September Term, 1997
Air Transport Association of America,
Petitioner
v.
Department of Transportation, et al.,
Respondents
_______________________________________
And Consolidated Case No. 96-1269
BEFORE: Silberman, Ginsburg, and Henderson, Circuit Judges
O R D E R
On consideration of respondents' petition for rehearing, and the response thereto, it
is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition for rehearing is granted in part, and the
opinion filed on August 1, 1997, is amended as follows:
Page 15, concluding paragraph, lines 4-6, delete the entire last
sentence of the opinion and insert in lieu thereof the following:
"Accordingly, we vacate the challenged provisions of the Final
Policy, paragraphs 2.4, 2.4.1, 2.4.1(a), 2.5.1, 2.5.1(a), 2.5.1(b),
2.5.1(c), 2.5.1(d), 2.5.1(e), 2.5.3, 2.5.3(a), 2.6, the Secretary's
supporting discussion in the preamble, and any other portions of
the rule necessarily implicated by the holding of our opinion,
and remand this proceeding to the Secretary. Our action in this
case does not reinstate any part of the Secretary's Interim Policy
that the Final Policy was intended to replace."
United States Court of Appeals
for the district of columbia circuit
No. 96-1253 September Term, 1997
It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court, that respondents' petition for rehearing
is otherwise denied.
Per Curiam
For the Court:
Mark Langer, Clerk
Filed On: October 15, 1997
for the district of columbia circuit
No. 96-1253 September Term, 1997
Air Transport Association of America,
Petitioner
v.
Department of Transportation, et al.,
Respondents
_______________________________________
And Consolidated Case No. 96-1269
BEFORE: Silberman, Ginsburg, and Henderson, Circuit Judges
O R D E R
On consideration of respondents' petition for rehearing, and the response thereto, it
is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition for rehearing is granted in part, and the
opinion filed on August 1, 1997, is amended as follows:
Page 15, concluding paragraph, lines 4-6, delete the entire last
sentence of the opinion and insert in lieu thereof the following:
"Accordingly, we vacate the challenged provisions of the Final
Policy, paragraphs 2.4, 2.4.1, 2.4.1(a), 2.5.1, 2.5.1(a), 2.5.1(b),
2.5.1(c), 2.5.1(d), 2.5.1(e), 2.5.3, 2.5.3(a), 2.6, the Secretary's
supporting discussion in the preamble, and any other portions of
the rule necessarily implicated by the holding of our opinion,
and remand this proceeding to the Secretary. Our action in this
case does not reinstate any part of the Secretary's Interim Policy
that the Final Policy was intended to replace."
United States Court of Appeals
for the district of columbia circuit
No. 96-1253 September Term, 1997
It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court, that respondents' petition for rehearing
is otherwise denied.
Per Curiam
For the Court:
Mark Langer, Clerk
Filed On: October 15, 1997
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.