Rochelle Garza v. Eric Hargan, No. 17-5276 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 17-5276 September Term, 2017 1:17-cv-02122-TSC Filed On: December 20, 2017 Rochelle Garza, as guardian ad litem to unaccompanied minor J.D., on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, et al., Appellees v. Eric D. Hargan, Acting Secretary, Health and Human Services, et al., Appellants -----------------------------Consolidated with 17-5277 BEFORE: Rogers, Tatel, and Millett, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the unopposed motions for voluntary dismissal filed by the government and the individual Appellants, and the Appellees’ sealed motion for leave to file document under seal and for leave to file redacted version on the public record, it is ORDERED that the government’s motion for voluntary dismissal be granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the individual Appellants’ motion for voluntary dismissal be granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the court will retain jurisdiction over the Appellees’ sealed motion for leave to file document under seal and for leave to file redacted version on the public record, see D.C. Cir. Rule 47.1(f); Fed. R. App. P. 10(e)(2)(C), and that disposition of that motion be held in abeyance pending the district court’s disposition of the motion to unseal the same material pending before it, United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 17-5276 September Term, 2017 see D.C. Cir. Rule 47.1(c). The parties are directed to file motions to govern further proceedings within five days of the district court’s disposition of the pending motion. Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith to the district court. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: Page 2 /s/ Ken Meadows Deputy Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.