ARC Bridges, Inc. v. NLRB, No. 15-1113 (D.C. Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseArc Bridge petitioned for review of the Board's holding that it violated sections 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by failing to give a wage increase to represented employees, with whom it was then bargaining, when it increased the wages of its nonunion employees. The DC Circuit granted Arc Bridge's petition for review and vacated the Board's decision and order, holding that substantial evidence did not support the Board's inference that antiunion animus motivated Arc Bridge's decision not to give a unilateral wage increase to the represented employees in October 2007. The court denied the Board's cross-application for enforcement.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.