ROBERT SNYDER V. KATHLEEN ALLISON, ET AL, No. 23-55037 (9th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED SEP 22 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT R. SNYDER, No. Plaintiff-Appellant, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 23-55037 D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00432-MMAWVG v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, CDCR; RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, MEMORANDUM* Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 12, 2023** Before: CANBY, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. California state prisoner Robert R. Snyder appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to prosecute. Pagtalunan v. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Snyder’s action for failure to prosecute where Snyder failed to file a timely amended complaint. See Pagtalunan, 291 F.3d at 642-643 (discussing factors a court should consider before dismissing an action for failure to comply with a court order). We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED. 2 23-55037
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
