1996 Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

Opinions 3501 - 4000 of 4104

Plaintiff v. Defendant
Date: February 28, 1996
Citation: 78 F.3d 595
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 671, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 1017the People of the State of California; Public Utilitiescommission of the State of California; Petitioners,pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("papuc"); Southerncalifornia Coalition on Battered Women; Toward Utility Ratenormalization ("turn"); Consumer Federation of America;consumer Action; the National Association of Social Workers("nasw"); the California Alliance Against Domesticviolence; the Family Violence Prevention Fund;petitioners-intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica; Respondents,us West Communications; Mci Telecommunications Corporation;ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee ("committee");at & T Corporation; the National Association of Regulatoryutility Commissioners; National Association of Consumeradvocates (nasuca), Ameritech Operating Companies;southwestern Bell Telephone Company; Pacific Bell; Unitedstates Telephone Association (usta); Bellsouth Corporation;respondents-intervenors.the People of the State of California; Public Utilitiescommission of the State of California; Petitioners,consumer Federation of America; Southern Californiacoalition on Battered Women; National Association Ofregulatory Utility Commissioners ("naruc"); Toward Utilityrate Normalization ("turn"); California Alliance Againstdomestic Violence; the Family Violence Prevention Fund("fund"); Consumer Action; National Association of Socialworkers ("nasw") and the Pennsylvania Public Utilitycommission ("papuc"); Petitioners-intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica; Respondents,bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. ("bellsouth");southwestern Bell Telephone Company; National Telephonecooperative Association; Gte California Incorporated(hereinafter "gtec"); Mci Telecommunications Corporation;the United States Telephone Association ("usta"); Us Westcommunications; Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee;respondents-intervenors.at & T Corporation, Petitioners,mci Telecommunications Corporation; Consumer Federation Ofamerica; Consumer Action; National Association of Socialworkers; California Alliance Against Domestic Violence;the Family Violence Prevention Fund; Southern Californiacoalition of Battered Women; Petitioners-intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica; Respondents,southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("southwestern Bell");national Telephone Cooperative Association; Bell Atlantictelephone Companies ("bell Atlantic"); Ameritech; Gteservice Corporation ("gte"); Respondents-intervenors.competitive Telecommunications Association; Petitioner,consumer Federation of America, California Alliance Againstdomestic Violence & the Family Violence Preventionfund; Petitioners-intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica; Respondents
Date: January 31, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 1350
In Re Grand Jury No. 94-1
Date: January 31, 1996
Citation: 76 F.3d 386
Susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; William First; Timothy S. Zenk; Margaretcolony; League of Women Voters of Washington; Georgecheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley,plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants, v. Ralph Munro; Christine O. Gregoire,defendants-appellants-cross-appellees,limit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel,defendants-intervenors-appellants-cross-appellees,andu.s. Term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill; Wilbur B.mcpherson, Defendants-intervenors.susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; William First; Timothy S. Zenk; Margaretcolony; League of Women Voters of Washington; Georgecheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Ralph Munro; Christine O. Gregoire, Defendants,limit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel; U.s.term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill; Wilburb. Mcpherson, Defendants-intervenors,andcitizens for Term Limits, Intervenor-defendant-appellant.susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; William First; Timothy S. Zenk; Margaretcolony; League of Women Voters of Washington; Georgecheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Ralph Munro; Christine O. Gregoire, Defendants-appellants,andlimit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel; U.s.term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill; Wilburb. Mcpherson, Defendants-intervenors.susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; William First; Timothy S. Zenk, Plaintiffs,andmargaret Colony; League of Women Voters of Washington;george Cheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Ralph Munro; Christine Gregoire, Defendants-appellees,andlimit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel; U.s.term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill; Wilburb. Mcpherson, Defendants-intervenors-appellees.susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; Timothy S. Zenk; William First,plaintiffs-appellants,andmargaret Colony; League of Women Voters of Washington;george Cheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley, Plaintiffs, v. Ralph Munro; Christine Gregoire, Defendants-appellees,limit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel;u.s. Term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill;wilbur B. Mcpherson,defendants-intervenors-appellees
Date: January 30, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 454
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,039
Date: January 23, 1996
Citation: 76 F.3d 388
Flynn v. Ballinger
Date: January 18, 1996
Citation: 76 F.3d 386

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.