INDRATATI SELAMET V. WILLIAM BARR, No. 18-70077 (9th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FEB 26 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INDRATATI SELAMET, Petitioner, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 18-70077 Agency No. A088-129-499 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 19, 2019** Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Indratati Selamet, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Selamet’s untimely motion to reopen where Selamet failed to establish materially changed country conditions in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception to the filing deadline. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 986 (“The BIA can deny a motion to reopen [for] . . . failure to introduce previously unavailable, material evidence . . .” (citation omitted)). We deny Selamet’s request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 12). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 18-70077

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.