CRISTA RAMOS, ET AL V. CHAD WOLF, ET AL, No. 18-16981 (9th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 14, 2020.
Download PDF
FILED FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CRISTA RAMOS; CRISTINA MORALES; BENJAMIN ZEPEDA; ORLANDO ZEPEDA; JUAN EDUARDO AYALA FLORES; ELSY YOLANDA FLORES DE AYALA; MARIA JOSE AYALA FLORES; HNAIDA CENEMAT; WILNA DESTIN; RILYA SALARY; SHERIKA BLANC; IMARA AMPIE; MAZIN AHMED; HIWAIDA ELARABI, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 18-16981 D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01554-EMC Northern District of California, San Francisco ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of Homeland Security; KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellants. MURGUIA, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated. Judges Owens and H.A. Thomas did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
