KIRSTEN COOK V. KENNETH COOK, No. 17-55543 (9th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED SEP 14 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIRSTEN COOK and ESTATE OF ETHAN COOK, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 17-55543 D.C. No. 8:15-cv-01448-CJC-JCG Plaintiffs-Appellants, MEMORANDUM* v. KENNETH ALAN COOK; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for Central California, Santa Ana Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 12, 2018 Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order entered December 6, 2016 (Dkt. 167), and its order entered February 8, 2017 (Dkt. 182). Under the circumstances, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P . 34(a)(2) ** to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. See Brown v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1187 (9th Cir. 2001) (stating standard).1 AFFIRMED. 1 Appellant’s motion for an extension of time in which to file a reply brief (Dkt. No. 78) is DENIED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.