Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., No. 17-16096 (9th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
The Ninth Circuit certified a question to the California Supreme Court in a separate published order. In this opinion, the panel reestablished the remaining holdings from the now-withdrawn opinion Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Int’l, Inc., 2019 WL 3271969 (9th Cir. Jul. 22, 2019).
The panel held that the doctrines of res judicata and law of the case did not bar plaintiffs from contending that they are employees under the ABC test in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court, 416 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2018). The panel rejected plaintiffs' contention that a retroactive application of Dynamex would violate their federal due process rights.
Court Description: Res Judicata. In a separate published order, the panel certified to the California Supreme Court the issue of the retroactive application of Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court, 416 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2018), and in this opinion, re- established the remaining holdings from the now-withdrawn opinion Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Int’l, Inc., 2019 WL 3271969 (9th Cir. Jul. 22, 2019). For the reasons laid out in the earlier opinion, the panel held that the doctrines of res judicata and law of the case did not bar plaintiffs from contending that they are employees under Dynamex’s ABC test, and rejected the contention that a retroactive application of Dynamex would violate their federal due process rights. * The Honorable Frederic Block, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. VAZQUEZ V. JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INT’L 3
This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 2, 2019.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.