USA V. FRANKLIN SALAS, No. 16-10345 (9th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 20 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 16-10345 D.C. No. 1:14-cr-00064-FMTG v. MEMORANDUM * FRANKLIN JOHN SALAS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Guam Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted November 15, 2017** Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Franklin John Salas appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Salas contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court (i) double counted by applying a Guidelines enhancement for leadership and also justifying a high-end sentence for that same reason, (ii) used his negative drug tests, an ostensibly mitigating factor, as an aggravating factor, and (iii) used his failure to cooperate fully with the government as an aggravating factor. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. The record belies Salas’s argument that the district court treated his negative drug tests as an aggravating factor. Moreover, the district court properly considered Salas’s leadership role and lack of cooperation. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); United States v. Christensen, 732 F.3d 1094, 1100-01 (9th Cir. 2013) (district court may weigh factors already accounted for in the Guidelines calculation when selecting the sentence under section 3553(a)). AFFIRMED. 2 16-10345

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.