USA V. MARVIN FUNEZ-GONZALEZ, No. 14-10180 (9th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 14-10180 14-10181 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:10-cr-02582-CKJ 4:13-cr-00697-CKJ v. MARVIN ROLANDO FUNEZGONZALEZ, a.k.a. Marvin Rolando Funes-Gonzalez, a.k.a. Marvin Rolando Gonzalez, a.k.a. Marvin Funes-Gonzales, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Linda R. Reade, District Judge, Presiding** Submitted April 7, 2015*** Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated appeals, Marvin Rolando Funez-Gonzalez appeals his * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Funez-Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Funez-Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Funez-Gonzalez waived the right to appeal his conviction, the revocation of supervised release, and his sentences. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waivers. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss these appeals. See id. at 988. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 14-10180 & 14-10181
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
