USA V. IMRAN MIR, No. 14-10010 (9th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED OCT 21 2015 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 14-10010 D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00141-JAM v. MEMORANDUM* IMRAN AHMED MIR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 14, 2015** Before: SILVERMAN, BERZON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Imran Ahmed Mir appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mir contends that the district court erred by determining that sentencing entrapment is not a legal basis for an objection to a presentence report. The record belies Mir’s contention that the court made this determination. Moreover, contrary to Mir’s contention, the district court met its procedural obligations when it considered and rejected Mir’s objections to the presentence report. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(3)(B). AFFIRMED. 2 14-10010

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.