name.space, Inc. V. ICANN, No. 13-55553 (9th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseThe Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) creates and assigns top level domains (TLDs), such as “.com” and “.net.” Plaintiff, a registry specializing in “expressive” TLDs, filed suit alleging that the 2012 Application Round for the creation of new TLDs violated federal and California law. The district court dismissed the complaint. The court rejected plaintiff's claims for conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1, because plaintiff failed to allege an anticompetitive agreement; the court rejected plaintiff's claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, because ICANN’s authority was lawfully obtained through a contract with the DOC and did not unlawfully acquire or maintain its monopoly; the trademark and unfair competition claims were not ripe for adjudication because plaintiff has not alleged that ICANN has delegated or intends to delegate any of the TLDs that plaintiff uses; and the complaint failed to allege a claim for tortious interference or unfair business practice. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Court Description: Antitrust / Trademark The panel affirmed the dismissal of an antitrust suit brought against the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which, under contract with the Department of Commerce, creates and assigns top level domains, such as “.com” and “.net.” name.space, a registry specializing in “expressive” top level domains, such as .art and .food, challenged ICANN’s 2012 round of applications for new top level domains to be included in the ICANN “root zone file.” The panel held that the complaint did not state a claim for conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce under § 1 of the Sherman Act because it did not sufficiently allege an anticompetitive agreement. The complaint did not state a claim for monopolization in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act because ICANN is not a competitor in the market to act as a top level domain registry, the international market for domain names, or the market for blocking or defensive registration services. The panel held that trademark and unfair competition claims were not ripe for adjudication because the complaint
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.