DONALD ENO V. SALLY JEWELL, No. 13-15166 (9th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 27, 2015.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DONALD E. ENO, No. 13-15166 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01691KJM-JFM SALLY JEWELL; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS; U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees. ORDER Filed November 12, 2015 Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Mary H. Murguia, and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges. 2 ENO V. JEWELL ORDER The opinion filed on August 27, 2015, appearing at 798 F.3d 1245, is hereby amended. The petition for rehearing is granted in part and the opinion is amended as follows: At slip op. page 11 n.2, change “We observed as much in a prior appeal involving Eno and charges of unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands.” to “We observed as much in a prior appeal, involving unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands, to which Eno was not a party.” With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
