USA V. GERARDO IBARRA-RAMIREZ, No. 11-10352 (9th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 11-10352 D.C. No. 4:11-cr-00138-CKJ-JJM1 v. GERARDO IBARRA-RAMIREZ, AKA Javier Hernandez-Hernandez, AKA Javier Gustavo Hernandez-Hernandez, AKA Javier Hernandez-Reyes, MEMORANDUM * Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 15, 2012 ** Before: CANBY, GRABER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gerardo Ibarra-Ramirez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70 month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ibarra-Ramirez s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the available record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.