IGNACIO DIAZ-PEREZ V. ERIC HOLDER, JR., No. 10-70644 (9th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on June 3, 2013.
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 03 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IGNACIO DIAZ-PEREZ, No. Petitioner, 10-70644 Agency No. A031-083-017 v. ORDER* LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 15, 2013** San Francisco, California Before: CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** Senior District Judge. Respondent’s unopposed motion to vacate this Court’s June 3, 2013 disposition and remand the petition to the Board of Immigration Appeals (the * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. “Board”) is granted. Petitioner’s motion to vacate and remand is likewise granted. Petitioner’s removal is stayed pending the Board’ decision on remand. Petitioner may file a motion to reinstate this petition within 30 days of the Board’ decision. The parties have agreed to bear their own costs and fees. Petitioner’s motion for panel rehearing is denied as moot. This order shall act as and for the mandate of the court. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
