USA v. Jerry Pool, No. 09-10303 (9th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 14, 2010.

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JERRY ARBERT POOL, Defendant-Appellant. ï£¼ ï£½ No. 09-10303 D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00015EJG-1 ï£¾ ORDER Filed September 19, 2011 ORDER Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Pamela Ann Rymer, Susan P. Graber, William A Fletcher, Richard A. Paez, Carlos T. Bea, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Sandra S. Ikuta, N. Randy Smith and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges. ORDER We have been advised that Pool has entered a guilty plea. The parties agree there is no longer a live controversy, and the case is moot. See In re Pattullo, 271 F.3d 898, 900 (9th Cir. 2001) ( If a case becomes moot while pending on appeal, it must be dismissed. ). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, vacate the panel s opinion, vacate the district court s and magistrate judge s orders and remand with instructions to dismiss the action. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950). The oral argument set for September 20, 2011 in San Francisco, California is vacated. 18041

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.