CPATH, et al v. Office of US Trade, et al, No. 06-16682 (9th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR PUBLIC ANALYSIS ON TRADE AND HEALTH (CPATH CALIFORNIA PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION NORTH; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE; et al., Defendants-Appellees. ï£¼ ï£½ No. 06-16682 D.C. No. CV-05-05177-MJJ ORDER AMENDING OPINION ï£¾ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 16, 2008 San Francisco, California Filed October 8, 2008 Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Richard Mills,* District Judge. *The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation. 14269 14270 CPATH v. OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRADE REP. ORDER The caption in case number 06-16682, as well as the caption on the Opinion filed August 22, 2008 is amended as follows. CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS ON TRADE AND HEALTH (CPATH), CALIFORNIA PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION NORTH, CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION, No. 06-16682 PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Defendants-Appellees. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.