LANDRIGAN V SCHRIRO, No. 00-99011 (9th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEFFREY TIMOTHY LANDRIGAN, a.k.a. Billy Patrick Wayne Hill, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. ï£¼ ï£½ No. 00-99011 D.C. No. CV-96-02367-PHXROS ORDER ï£¾ On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed September 4, 2007 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, Michael Daly Hawkins, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard R. Clifton, Consuelo M. Callahan and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges. ORDER The mandate, issued on May 8, 2006, is recalled. In light of the Supreme Court s mandate, issued on July 30, 2007, in Schriro v. Landrigan, 127 S. Ct. 1933 (2007), we vacate our en banc decision, Landrigan v. Schriro, 441 F.3d 638 (9th Cir. 2006), and affirm the district court s denial of an evidentiary hearing on Landrigan s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We again adopt the three-judge panel s holdings with respect to the additional sentencing issues raised on appeal, Landrigan v. Stewart, 272 F.3d 1221, 1229-31 (9th Cir. 11285 11286 LANDRIGAN v. SCHRIRO 2001). Therefore, the district court s denial of Landrigan s petition for writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.