North Dakota Retail Assoc. v. Board of Governors, No. 22-1639 (8th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on December 14, 2022.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1639 ___________________________ North Dakota Retail Association; North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association; Corner Post, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellant v. Board of Governors, of the Federal Reserve System Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Western ____________ Submitted: August 5, 2024 Filed: August 21, 2024 [Published] ____________ Before SMITH, BENTON and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Corner Post, Inc.—a truck stop and convenience store—opened for business in March 2018 and immediately began accepting debit cards for payment. In 2021, it joined a pending lawsuit by two North Dakota associations against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The plaintiffs made a facial challenge to the Board’s Regulation II, under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 704. See Regulation II, Debit Card Interchange Fees and Routing, 76 Fed. Reg. 43,394, 43,420 (July 20, 2011). They alleged that the debit-card transaction fees under Regulation II (a maximum interchange fee of 21 cents per debit-card transaction and an ad valorem allowance of 0.05 percent of the transaction) were arbitrary and capricious, contrary to the APA, and violated the Durbin Amendment to the DoddFrank Act of 2010. The Board moved to dismiss based on the statute of limitations. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a), a complaint against the United States must be “filed within six years after the right of action first accrues.” The district court dismissed the suit, finding that the statute of limitations on Corner Post’s facial claims began to run with the publication of Regulation II in 2011. Corner Post, Inc. v. Bd. of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys., 2022 WL 909317, *8 (D.N.D. Mar. 11, 2022). On appeal, this court affirmed, holding that “when plaintiffs bring a facial challenge to a final agency action, the right of action accrues, and the limitations period begins to run, upon publication of the regulation.” North Dakota Retail Ass’n v. Bd. of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys., 55 F.4th 634, 641 (8th Cir. 2022). On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed this court’s judgment and remanded for further proceedings, holding that Corner Post’s claims were not time-barred as they accrued at the time of injury, not at the issuance of the regulation. Corner Post, Inc. v. Bd. of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys., 144 S. Ct. 2440, 2460 (2024). “An APA claim does not accrue for purposes of § 2401(a)’s 6-year statute of limitations until the plaintiff is injured by final agency action. Because Corner Post filed suit within six years of its injury, § 2401(a) did not bar its challenge to Regulation II.” Id. In accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision, this court’s opinion of December 14, 2022 is vacated, and this case remanded to the district court for further proceedings. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
