Timothy Brown v. Continental Resources, Inc., No. 22-1230 (8th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this Case
Continental Resources, Inc. operates an input well on Timothy and Tracy Browns’ land in Harding County, South Dakota. The Browns sued Continental, seeking compensation for damage to the surface of their land and Continental’s use of their pore space. Continental removed the case to federal court and twice moved for partial summary judgment. The district court granted both motions, finding that Plaintiffs: (1) released Continental from liability for surface damage; and (2) could not recover damages under South Dakota law for Continental’s pore space use.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed. The court explained that section 45-5A-4 clearly articulates three categories of compensable harm. Plaintiffs sought damages for lost use, which is not one of the categories. They try to infuse ambiguity into the statutory scheme by pointing to Chapter 45-5A’s purpose and legislative findings sections. While these sections may help a court interpret ambiguous statutory language, the court found none in Section 45-5A-4. Accordingly, the court held that Plaintiffs have not suffered compensable harm under South Dakota law, so the district court did not err in granting summary judgment.
Court Description: [Kobes, Author, with Kelly and Wollman, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Oil and Gas. The Drilling and Pipeline Agreements between the parties released defendants from liability for surface damage plaintiffs allege was caused by defendant trucking water to the well site; the trucks were operated in connection with input and oil recovery operations and the agreements contemplated such activities and released defendant from any and all surface damages flowing from the operations; South Dakota law does not recognize a claim for lost use and the district court did not err in granting defendant summary judgment on plaintiff's claim for compensation for lost use of pore space. [ January 26, 2023 ]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.