Transdev Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 19-3570 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
The Eighth Circuit denied Transdev's petition for review of the Board's order allowing a certain class of Transdev's workers to seek union representation where the Board determined that Transdev failed to show the workers were supervisors under Section 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act. The court concluded that substantial evidence supports the Board's conclusion that Transdev failed to prove road supervisors have the authority to discipline operators. The court also concluded that substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that Transdev failed to sufficiently prove road supervisors have the authority to discipline or effectively recommend discipline, and therefore Transdev failed to prove road supervisors are statutory supervisors on this basis.
In regard to Transdev's alternative argument, the court found that the Board reasonably concluded that the one-time distribution of gift cards under the circumstances described by two road supervisors was insufficient to show that road supervisors have the authority to reward. Furthermore, the Board's decision that Transdev failed to show road supervisors responsibly direct other employees was supported by substantial evidence. Finally, the Board's decision here was supported by substantial evidence, and it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in finding that Transdev failed to show road supervisors were statutory supervisors, certifying the union, and finding that Transdev committed an unfair labor practice. Accordingly, the court granted the Board's cross-petition for enforcement of its order.
Court Description: [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Wollman, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement. The Board found that Transdev had failed to show that a certain class of workers called road supervisors were supervisors under Section 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act and allowed them to organize; Transdev petitions for review of that order and the Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its related order determining Transdev unlawfully refused to bargain with the union as certified representatives of the workers. Transdev's petition for review is denied and the cross-petition is granted. The Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence and it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in finding that Transdev failed to show the road supervisors were statutory supervisors, certifying the union or finding that Transdev committed an unfair labor practice.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.