Smith v. Saul, No. 19-2731 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the denial of social security benefits to plaintiffs, rejecting plaintiffs' claim that the ALJs who denied their claims were not properly appointed under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. The court held that plaintiffs' unexhausted claims are foreclosed by Davis v. Saul, 963 F.3d 790 (8th Cir. 2020), cert. granted, 2020 WL 6551772 (Nov. 9, 2020) (No. 20-105).
Court Description: [Colloton, Author, with Grasz and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. Claimants' unexhausted claims that the ALJs who denied their claims were not properly appointed under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution are foreclosed by this court's decision in Davis v. Saul, 963 F.3d 790 (8th Cir. 2020), cert. granted, 2020 WL 6551772 (Nov. 9, 2020) (No. 20-105).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.