United States v. Harris, No. 19-2031 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's reduction of defendant's sentence pursuant to the First Step Act. The court held that the district court accurately noted that the sentence sought to be reduced was a substantial downward variance from the applicable guideline range and concluded the initial variance had eliminated excessiveness the First Step Act was intended to remedy. Furthermore, in evaluating the existing sentence, the district court also considered post-sentence rehabilitation and the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) sentencing factors. The court also held that there was no procedural or legal error in defendant's 216 month sentence, and the district court did not abuse its substantial sentencing discretion or impose a substantively unreasonable sentence by declining to reduce defendant's sentence below 216 months imprisonment.
Court Description: [Loken, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. After determining defendant was eligible for a First Step Act reduction, the court reduced his sentence from 240 to 216 months; the court committed no procedural or legal error in evaluating the matter and the new sentence was not substantively unreasonable.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.