Lee Reddix v. Arkansas Dept of Workforce Svc, No. 19-1899 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Erickson, Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Employment discrimination. Order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment affirmed without comment. [ April 02, 2020 ]
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1899 ___________________________ Lee Reddix lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Arkansas Department of Workforce Services lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena ____________ Submitted: March 31, 2020 Filed: April 3, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Lee Reddix appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the 1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training, LLC, 656 F.3d 782, 791 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
