Charles Foster v. Department of Army, No. 19-1777 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Erickson and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil Procedure. Dismissal for failure to prosecute affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1777 ___________________________ Charles A. Foster lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Department of Army lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________ Submitted: February 4, 2020 Filed: February 12, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Charles Foster appeals after the district court1 dismissed his employment discrimination action for failure to prosecute. Having carefully reviewed the record 1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. and the arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Burgs v. Sissel, 745 F.2d 526, 528 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (reviewing sua sponte dismissal for lack of prosecution for abuse of discretion); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
