United States v. Ricky Thomas, No. 18-3275 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Chief Judge Smith, Wollman, and Beam, Circuit Judges] Criminal Case - SORNA. Retroactive application of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act's registration requirement based on Thomas's 1993 Minnesota conviction for second-degree criminal sexual conduct was not based on an unconstitutional delegation according to the Supreme Court's decision in Gundy v. United States.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3275 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Ricky Lynn Thomas lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________ Submitted: September 23, 2019 Filed: October 31, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. After moving to Iowa in March 2017, Ricky Thomas failed to register with the sex offender registry as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 34 U.S.C. § 20913 (SORNA), based upon his 1993 Minnesota conviction for second-degree criminal sexual conduct. Thus, in February 2018, Thomas was indicted with one count of Failure to Register as a Sex Offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). SORNA was not enacted until 2006, but in 2007, the Attorney General declared that the Act would be applied retroactively to individuals like Thomas who were convicted of offenses that require registration under SORNA but were committed prior to its enaction. Thomas moved to dismiss the federal indictment, arguing that retroactive application of § 20913(d) unconstitutionally violated the nondelegation doctrine of Article I, § 1 of the United States Constitution. The district court1 denied the motion to dismiss, citing Eighth Circuit precedent contrary to the argument advanced. See United States v. Kuehl, 706 F.3d 917, 920 (8th Cir. 2013) (rejecting the constitutional nondelegation objection to the retroactive application of SORNA). Thomas entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving his right to advance the constitutional argument on appeal. The Supreme Court recently rejected the argument Thomas now makes, holding that Congress did not “make an impermissible delegation when it instructed the Attorney General to apply SORNA’s registration requirements to pre-Act offenders as soon as feasible.” Gundy v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2116, 2129 (2019). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
