United States v. Derrill Watt, No. 18-3232 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Gruender, and Stras, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal case. Anders case. Defendant executed a valid, enforceable and applicable appeal waiver and the appeal is dismissed.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3232 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Derrill Watt Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: July 15, 2019 Filed: July 22, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Derrill Watt pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm he knew was stolen, 18 U.S.C. § 922(j). As part of his plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal his sentence unless it exceeded his Sentencing Guidelines range. The 80-month sentence the district court1 imposed was below his 84- to 105-month Guidelines range. In an Anders brief, Watt’s counsel requests permission to withdraw and identifies the applicability of a four-level Guidelines enhancement for possessing a firearm in connection with another felony offense as an issue on appeal. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B); see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In a pro se brief, Watt makes the same argument. We review the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver de novo. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010). Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable and that it is applicable to the issue raised on appeal. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel permission to withdraw. _______________________________________________ 1 The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
