Charles Sokpa-Anku v. William P. Barr, No. 18-1997 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Gruender and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioner's motion to reopen and reconsider.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1997 ___________________________ Charles Sokpa-Anku lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: April 9, 2019 Filed: April 12, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Charles Sokpa-Anku, a citizen of Ghana who was ordered removed in 2015, petitions for review after the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied his motion to reopen and reconsider. After careful review, we conclude the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Sokpa-Anku’s motion. See Mshihiri v. Holder, 753 F.3d 785, 7889 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review). The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
