Jones v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., No. 18-1851 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseWhen Aetna terminated plaintiff's disability benefits, she filed an Employee Retirement Income Security Act suit. The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment on remand, holding that the district court did not err by determining that plaintiff failed to administratively exhaust her breach of fiduciary duty claim.
Court Description: Benton, Author, with Gruender and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - ERISA. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see Jones v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 856 F.3d 541 (8th Cir. 2017). On remand, the district court did not err in determining that Aetna did not breach its fiduciary duty to plaintiff.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.