United States v. Darden, No. 17-3373 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
When resentencing follows a successful 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion based on counsel's failure to appeal, the prescribed procedure is for the district court to vacate the sentence and then reimpose it. The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of defendant's section 2255 motion to vacate his sentence.
The court held that the district court did not procedurally err when it resentenced defendant to 200 months in 2017 where it followed clearly established procedure. Furthermore, even if the court were to agree with defendant that the sentencing package doctrine or any other consideration should compel district courts to follow a different procedure, any error the district court committed here would not be plain. The court also held that defendant's convictions for second-degree assault on a law enforcement officer were violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); defendant's challenge to his second degree assault convictions was procedurally defaulted; even if his assault convictions were considered a single conviction, he still had the requisite predicate offenses under the ACCA; and defendant's final two arguments were procedurally defaulted.
Court Description: Melloy, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Stras, Circuit Judge] Prisoner case - Habeas. For defendant's direct appeal, see U.S. v. Darden, 688 F.3d 382 (8th Cir. 2012); when a sentence is vacated because counsel failed to appeal, the prescribed procedure is for the district court to vacate the sentence and then reimpose it, and the district court followed this clearly established procedure; even if the sentencing package doctrine or any other consideration should compel a district court to follow a different procedure, any error the district court might commit in not following that different procedure would not be plain; defendant's convictions for second-degree assault on a law enforcement officer were violent felonies under the ACCA; defendant's argument that his 2004 second-degree assault convictions should be considered a single conviction was procedurally defaulted; even if considered a single conviction, defendant still had three predicate offenses for ACCA sentencing; argument raised for the first time on appeal would not be considered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.