United States v. Clarett, No. 17-3057 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed defendant's conviction for conspiracy to commit, and use of a facility of interstate commerce in the commission of, murder for hire. The court held that the district court did not err by declining to instruct the jury on entrapment because there was insufficient evidence to raise a jury question that defendant was induced by a government agent. Therefore, the court need not consider whether defendant was predisposed to commit the crime of which he was convicted.
Court Description: Erickson, Author, with Wollman and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not in refusing to give an entrapment instruction as defendant was not induced by a government agent.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.