United States v. Jason Kirlin, No. 17-2890 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court's order denying defendant's Rule 41(g) for return of property affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2890 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Jason W. Kirlin, also known as Jay, also known as Rock, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: April 20, 2018 Filed: April 30, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Jason Kirlin appeals the district court’s1 order denying his motion for return of property, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g). After careful review, see 1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, now retired. Jackson v. United States, 526 F.3d 394, 398 (8th Cir. 2008), we agree with the district court that Kirlin was not entitled to return of the property. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
