United States v. Omar Maria, No. 17-2533 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. The sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release was not an abuse of the district court's discretion.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2533 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Omar D. Maria lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: March 27, 2018 Filed: April 3, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Omar Maria directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district court imposed upon revoking his supervised release. His counsel has moved for 1 1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. After careful review of the record, this court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Maria. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range). The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
