Nathan Hoggard v. Roger Page, No. 17-2525 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Defendants' summary judgment in this negligence action affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2525 ___________________________ Nathan Hoggard lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant Jerry Williams lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff v. Roger Page, Individually and as Registered Agent and as Member and Owner of Arabi Cattle Company other Arabi Cattle Company; Jim Franklin, Individually and as Employee of Arabi Cattle Company; Arabi Cattle Company LLC, Limited Liability Company lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro ____________ Submitted: April 12, 2018 Filed: May 7, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In this diversity action involving a negligence claim, Nathan Hoggard appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. After de novo review, we agree with the District Court’s determination that defendants did not owe or assume a duty of care giving rise to liability for the injuries Hoggard sustained during a hay-loading accident. We affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
