United States v. Murphy, No. 17-1911 (8th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed defendant's sentence of 160 months in prison after he pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery. The court found no error, plain or otherwise, in the district court's imposition of defendant's sentence and the sentence was substantively reasonable. In this case, the district court adequately explained the sentence imposed and its deviation from the Guidelines range; considered all of the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) sentencing factors; had substantial latitude to determine how much weight to give the various factors; and was permitted to conclude that the Guidelines failed to adequately account for defendant's prior criminal history and his likelihood to reoffend.
Court Description: Reade, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not abuse its discretion in weighing the 3553(a) factors or in concluding the guidelines failed to adequately account for defendant's prior criminal history, both scored and unscored, and his likelihood to reoffend; sentence was not substantively unreasonable.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.