United States v. Kevin Herring, No. 17-1634 (8th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. The sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release was not an abuse of the district court's discretion. [ July 20, 2017

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-1634 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Kevin Herring lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________ Submitted: July 13, 2017 Filed: July 21, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Kevin Herring appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 10-month sentence. His counsel has moved for leave to 1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. withdraw and has filed a brief questioning the reasonableness of Herring’s revocation sentence. Our review of the record satisfies us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Herring as it did. See United States v. Johnson, 827 F.3d 740, 744 (8th Cir. 2016) (appellate court reviews district court’s revocation sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard). The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is granted. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.