Andrew Aames v. United States, No. 17-1619 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Order dismissing plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of state and federal statutes requiring him to register as a sex offender affirmed; however, the dismissal of the state-law request for relief is modified to be without prejudice. [ November 28, 2017
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-1619 ___________________________ Andrew B. Aames, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. United States of America; State of Missouri; MO Jackson County, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees, Does 1 through 99, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: November 7, 2017 Filed: November 29, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Andrew Aames challenges the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint challenging the constitutionality of state and federal statutes requiring him to register as a sex offender. After carefully reviewing the record and the briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, but we modify the judgment so that the dismissal of Aames’s state-law request for relief is without prejudice. See Franklin v. Zain, 152 F.3d 783, 786 (8th Cir. 1998). The judgment is affirmed as modified. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
