Paulson v. McDermott, No. 16-6018 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseDebtor appealed from the bankruptcy court's order denying his motion to reinstate his dismissed Chapter 13 bankruptcy case and an order denying his motion to reconsider that order. The panel concluded that the bankruptcy court did not clearly err in concluding that debtor had no meritorious defense to the UST’s motion to dismiss. Therefore, the panel affirmed the bankruptcy court's order denying debtor's motion to reinstate the dismissed case and denying his motion to reconsider.
Court Description: Federman, Author, with Schermer and Saladino, Bankruptcy Judges] Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. The Bankruptcy Court did not abuse its discretion by denying debtor's motion to reinstate his Chapter 13 or by denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial order. [ November 16, 2016
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.