United States v. Mosley, Jr., No. 16-4379 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of defendants' motion to suppress evidence after they pleaded guilty to bank robbery. The court held that the district court properly concluded that the stop of a vehicle in which defendants were found in the trunk was supported by reasonable suspicion under the totality of the circumstances; the duration of the stop was reasonable where law enforcement pursued the mission of the stop -- assessing whether the vehicle was involved in a bank robbery -- diligently and without measurable delay; defendants lacked standing to challenge the search of the trunk; and any error in Defendant Mosely's designation as a career offender was harmless.
Court Description: Gruender, Author, with Chief Judge Smith and Wollman, Circuit Judges] Criminal Cases - suppression. Based on the close temporal and physical proximity of the grey Taurus to the bank robbery the totality of the circumstances indicates that reasonable suspicion supported the vehicle stop; the information from the witness -- its eyewitness knowledge, contemporaneous reporting and accountability was sufficiently reliable; the stop was not unlawfully extended, as the officer conferred with other officers and the mission of assessing whether the car was involved in the bank robbery was pursued diligently and without measurable delay. The defendants lacked standing to challenge the search of the trunk. Any error in Mosley's designation as a career offender is harmless because the district court indicated the sentence would be the same with or without the designation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.