Billy Turner, Jr. v. Jay Cassady, No. 16-3484 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Erickson and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Habeas. Turner failed to satisfy the standard for an actual-innocence claim and the district court did not err in denying his Section 2254 petition.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3484 ___________________________ Billy Ray Turner, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant v. Jay Cassady lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: September 5, 2019 Filed: September 12, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Billy Turner, who was sentenced to 49 years in prison after a Missouri jury found him guilty of first-degree sodomy and incest, appeals following the district court’s1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. During the section 2254 proceedings, Turner claimed that he was actually innocent and asserted a related prosecutorial-misconduct claim. On appeal, Turner has moved to submit supplemental briefing, to strike the State’s brief, and to amend his motion to strike. After careful de novo, we conclude that Turner failed to satisfy the standard for an actual-innocence claim, and that the district court thus did not err in denying his section 2254 petition. See McCoy v. Norris, 125 F.3d 1186, 1190 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review); see also Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 315-29 (1995) (to establish gateway actual-innocence claim, petitioner must show that, in light of all evidence, it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted him given new, reliable evidence). Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant Turner’s motions to file supplemental briefs and to amend his motion to strike, and we deny his amended motion to strike. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Nannette A. Baker, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
