United States v. Ford, No. 16-2752 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed from this 18 month prison sentence imposed after revoking his supervised release. The court concluded that the district court did not err when it properly analyzed the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) factors; the sentence was substantively reasonable where the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant, given his troubled history while on supervised release, as well as domestic assault; and thus the court affirmed the sentence.
Court Description: Rossiter, Author, with Wollman and Loken, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release affirmed as it is substantively reasonable and reflected the district court's weighing of the 3553(a) factors, including the circumstances of the violation and defendant's risk to the community.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.