Paul Katekaru v. Cameron Egan, No. 15-3662 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Smith, Benton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case. Defendants' judgment affirmed without comment. [ November 02, 2016
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-3662 ___________________________ Paul David Katekaru lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Cameron Egan, Officer; Greg Bryant, Sergeant; Terri Cipolla Round; City of Lee’s Summit, Missouri lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: October 31, 2016 Filed: November 3, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Paul Katekaru appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary judgment on two of his claims, dismissed a third claim without prejudice for lack of standing, and denied his post-judgment motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). After carefully reviewing the record, and parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis to reverse. See Brooks v. Roy, 776 F.3d 957, 959-60 (8th Cir. 2015) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo); Hodak v. City of St. Peters, 535 F.3d 899, 903 (8th Cir. 2008) (determination as to plaintiff’s standing reviewed de novo); United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933-34 (8th Cir. 2006) (denial of Rule 59(e) motion reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
