Donathan v. Oakley Grain, Inc., No. 15-3508 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's employment claim alleging retaliatory termination. The court held that a reasonable jury could conclude that her protected action was the but-for cause of her termination. In this case, it was undisputed that plaintiff's letter complaining of unequal pay based on her sex was a protected act and that she suffered an adverse employment action.
Court Description: Colloton, Melloy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Employment Discrimination. The district court erred in granting the employer's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that she was retaliated against and terminated after she opposed an unlawful employment practice - unequal pay based on sex - as she presented sufficient evidence that her action in raising the issue was the but-for cause for her termination. Judge Colloton, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.