United States v. Robert Solomon, No. 15-3015 (8th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release was not substantively unreasonable. [ December 22, 2015
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-3015 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Robert Solomon lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City ____________ Submitted: December 10, 2015 Filed: December 23, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. While Robert Solomon was serving a period of supervised release on a federal criminal sentence, he admitted to the district court1 that he had violated his release 1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. conditions. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a within-Guidelinesrange revocation sentence of 9 months in prison and 2 years of additional supervised release. On appeal, Solomon contends that the 9-month prison sentence is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
