United States v. Keeyon Dunbar, No. 15-2534 (8th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. The sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release was not substantively unreasonable. [ October 13, 2015
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2534 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Keeyon M. Dunbar lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: October 7, 2015 Filed: October 14, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. While Keeyon Dunbar was serving a period of supervised release on a federal criminal sentence, he admitted to the district court1 that he had violated his release 1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. conditions. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a within-Guidelinesrange revocation sentence of 11 months in prison. On appeal, Dunbar contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
